Press Release Back Number(2007)

Attachment:
Outline of the Inspection Results Relevant to the Electric Power Plants

March 30, 2007
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.

1. Purpose of the Inspection

We have verified whether the safety of the power plants is flawed due to incongruous phenomena (hereinafter called "Incongruous Phenomena"), and we have carried out inspections to assess whether there are falsification of data and deficiency and suchlike in the required procedures and other similar problems in relation to the hydraulic, thermal, and nuclear power plants, in accordance with the instructions (the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency Issue No 1 of November 30, 2006) "Concerning the Inspection of Electric Power Plants" received from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency.


2. Outline of the Inspection Results

The inspections carried out so far have found about 40 inappropriate incidents*.

However, we did verify that the Incongruous Phenomena did not at present compromise the safety of the nuclear, thermal, and hydraulic power plants.

Our company has implemented countermeasure to prevent thoroughly the recurrence of this kind of incidents.


*Cases: Please refer to 7 (2)


3. Inspection Structure

The company has established within the company an "Inspection/Assessment Committee for the Inspection of the Power Generation Plants" (hereinafter called "Committee"), and at the same time, the company hasl established, as a subordinate organ to the Committee, three "Sectional Meetings" (hereinafter called "Sectional Meeting") for each hydraulic, thermal, and nuclear power plant.

The Vice President shall chair the Committee, which shall comprise the Corporate Planning & Strategy Division, Legal Affaires Dept., and Internal Audit Office, to secure transparence and objectivity of the inspection of the plant related departments of the Nuclear Power Dept., Thermal Power Dept., Civil & Architectural Engineering Dept. and Electrical Engineering Dept.

The Internal Audit Office has audited the Committee and Sectional Meetings.


Drawing 1 Inspection Structure


4. Plants object of the Inspection

All the power plants, atomic, thermal and hydraulic plants (Refer to Table 1) were the object of the inspection.


Table 1 The number Power Plants Object of the Inspection and Number of Units in Each Power Plant

Power Plant Facilities Object of the Inspection
Atomic Power 1 Power Plant (5 Units)
Thermal Power 12 Power Plants ( 50 unites)
(Note; including 4 units within fuel power plant)
Hydraulic Power 183 Power Plants (259 units)
Total 196 Power Plants (314 Units)

5. Scope of the Inspection

The survey inspection shall not be limited in time or to a particular item (For example the target law) as to extract comprehensively the Incongruous Phenomena. Concerning data falsification (Measuring Instruments), records and the procedure for each item inspected, we shall enforce close inspection to verify the conditions of the safety maintenance state.

Table 2 shows the approach of the inspection scope.


Table 2 Approach of the Inspection Scope

*1 concerning the hydraulic power plants we have subjected a part of the records to more than what is stipulated by the law.

*2 concerning the atomic power plants, we have subjected them to a longer period (from October 2002) than reported (inspection report concerning the suitability of the security of the autonomous inspection operations of the Hamaoka Atomic Power Plant dated March 19,2003)


6 Inspected Items

Table 3 shows the inspection outline of the daily inspections and inspected items.


Table 3 Outline of the Inspection and Inspected Items

Inspected Item Outline of the Inspection
Extraction of Inappropriate Phenomena Based on the Inspection We sent a questionnaire to the employees, retired employees and to the employees of collaborating companies, who participated in the operation and maintenance of the engineering works of the power plant, and have carried out interviews (including questionnaire forms) with the concerned people concerning the extracted phenomena and verified the records and facilities.
Inspection of falsified data Measuring Instruments We inspected the safety conditions and verified the existence of processed data, corrections, and inappropriate revisions concerning the various measuring/computation apparatus.
Records We carried out comparisons of the records of the original data or comparison of the data that was possible to compare and verified the existence of falsifications.
Inspection of the Required Procedures' Deficiency We examined whether the procedures of the notifications and suchlike was enforced in compliance with the law for the engineering work carried out in the past was appropriately carried out or not.


7 Results of the Inspection

(1) Assessment method of the Results of the Inspection

Concerning the incidents extracted during the inspection, we assessed whether there were incongruous phenomena and concerning items that were judged incongruous phenomena, and have taken into consideration the significance of this incongruity, and we have classified and assessed them in table 4.


Table 4 Assessment Division of the Results of the Inspection
Assessment Division Comments
A Items that conflict with safety provisions and regulations and items that have compromised the safety of the facilities.
B Items that conflict with safety provisions or regulations, and which entail repairs of facilities.
C Items that conflict with safety provisions or regulations.
Items that may conflict with safety provisions or regulationsItems that are carried out extensively or continuously.
D Item that may conflict with safety provisions or regulations.

Note) Laws: Laws, Agreements between local authorities and the company's various policies


(2) The Results of the Assessment of the Results of the Inspection

We have adjusted as a single case all incidents considered the same in line with the pattern of the incidents and these results of the assessment concerning the assessment of the Incongruous Phenomena. Table 5 and 6 shows these results.


Table 5 Results arrangement of the case

(Cases)

Power Plant Assessment Division
A B C D - Total
Atomic Power 0 1 6 1 6 14
Thermal Power 0 2 9 3 1 15
Hydraulic Power 0 0 9 2 0 11
Total 0 3 24 6 7 40

Table 6 Incongruous Cases and Assessment

Atomic Power
No Matter of the Case Power Plant Period Assessment
1 Deficient procedure in the piping replacement repair work for nitrogen replenishment Hamaoka No 3 & 4 2006 B
2 Inappropriate control of the temperature difference of water drainage/intake Hamaoka No 1-4 1975-2003 C
3 Handling of unsuitable meter before the integrated performance test Hamaoka No 1-4 1976-2003 C
4 Inappropriate adjustment of the reactor core spray type pump exit pressure gauge Hamaoka No 1 Before 2001 C
5 Falsification of the verification record of the operation closure point at 10% of the principal steam stoppage valve Hamaoka No 2 2000 C
6 Inappropriate response at the time of failure of the nuclear instrumentation (LPRM) Hamaoka 1-3 1975-2000 C
7 Inappropriate response at the time of failure of the nuclear instrumentation (SRNM) Hamaoka No 2 1990 C
8 Mistaken computation method in the quarter report for the control of gaseous radioactive waste Hamaoka
Atomic Power Plant
1997-2006 D
9 Faulty communication report sent to the Operation Control Technical Expert Office Hamaoka
Atomic Power Plant
1980 to about 2002 -
10 Inappropriate adjustment of the gauge record of the principal steam release safety valve exhaust gas temperature Hamaoka No 3 1987 -
11 Setting discrepancy of the level indicator the of (A),(B) light oil tank for the emergency diesel power equipment Hamaoka No 3 From the time of the construction to 2006 -
12 Setting discrepancy level indicator the of (A),(B) light oil tank for the emergency diesel power equipment Hamaoka No 5 From the time of the construction to 2007 -
13 Setting discrepancy of the control for the flow transducer of the water supply flow meter of the atomic reactor Hamaoka No 3 From the time of the construction to 2006 -
14 Wrong setting range of the condensed water tank level meter Hamaoka No 5 From the time of the construction to 2007 -

* No.1, 11-14 cases already disclosed


Thermal Power
No Matter of the Case Power Plant Period Assessment
1 Inappropriate handling in the results of the inspection of the boiler facility Yokkaichi No 1-3 1992-1998 B
2 Data falsification of excess rated steam temperature (over 28 Celsius Degree) Chita No 4 1984 B
3 A leading electric construction damage was not reported West Nagoya No 1
Taketoyo No 2
1991 C
4 Power failure accident not reported Chita No 4
West Nagoya No 6
1994
1990
C
5 Falsification of the inspection record of the power plant (Boiler/Turbine) ShinNagoya No 3
Yokkaichi No 1-3
1994 1989
1992-2001
C
6 Inappropriate handling of excess power supply data Owase Mita No 1
Shinnagoya No 5-7
Yokkaichi No 1-4
Past - 2004 C
7 Inappropriate handling of the operation records in the safety daily record West Nagoya No 1-6
Shinnagoya No 6
Series 7
Yokkaichi No 3
Yokkaichi LNG Centre
Kawagoe No 1-4
Past - 2006 C
8 Falsification of chart record Yokkaichi,
Chita,
Taketoya
West Nagoya,
Atsumi
Past - 1995 C
9 Inappropriate handling at the time of miss measuring of chart record All thermal Plants 1965-2005 C
10 Inappropriate handling in the electric fault report Hekinan No 1 1995 D
11 Rewritten inspection record at the factory location Kawagoe No 1 or 2 1987 to about 1988 D
12 Inappropriate application form for the construction of the reserve boiler exhaust pipe according to the Building Standard Law Shinnagoya ,
AtsumiChita Second,
Kawagoe,
Hekinan
1968-2007 C
13 Falsification of the inspection record of the pressure resistance of the pipe for the dangerous substance based on the Fire Protection Law Shinnagoya Thermal Power Plant 2000 C
14 Falsification of the inspection record of the inside of the fuel tank based on the Fire Protection Law West Nagoya Thermal Power Plant 1993-1997 D
15 Inappropriate modification to the computing circuit of the condensate flow meter Hekinan No 4 & 5 No 4 2001/
No 5 2002
-

Hydraulic Power
No Matter of the Case Power Plant Period Assessment
1 Inappropriate procedure relevant to the water channel connection duct installation work Asahi Power Plant 1973 C
2 Inappropriate procedure for the construction work to replace the electric transformer 6 Power Plants including
Nishiwatari Power Plant
1987 - 1984 C
3 Inappropriate procedure for the construction work in the river district/river safety district region 68 Power Plants including
Igawa Power Plant
1970-2006 C
4 Inappropriate procedure concerning the land possession permission in the river district 3 Power Plants including
Abo Power Plant
1965 - 1986 C
5 Maximum processing of the quantity of water intake and quantity of water used All the Hydraulic Power Plants Unknown
- Present
C
6 Inappropriate procedure concerning the water intake for cooling water and general service water 24 Power Plants including
Yuyama Power Plant
1912-Present C
7 Inappropriate processing concerning the water intake not meeting the regulations for using water Futamata Power Plant 1929-Present C
8 Maximum processing of the submitted (approved) maximum output All the Hydraulic Power Plants Unknown
-2007
C
9 Inappropriate procedure concerning the handing of the minimum quantity of dangerous substance 3 Power Plants including
Shinhichsou Power Plant
2006/2007 C
10 Falsification of the water level of the dam in the "Gate Operations Record" Wachino Power Plant 2000 D
11 Falsification of the measurement inspection record in the construction work completion inspection record Kamimura Power Plant 1987 D

* No 1-7 Cases already disclosed



8 Analyses of the Causes and Countermeasures to Prevent Their Recurrence

Concerning each incident, we have examined the underlining problem and countermeasures to prevent the recurrence of each incident and assessed their suitability at the Committee,

The content of the countermeasures for prevent the recurrence are described in the Inspection Report Relevant to the Power Plants.


9 Conclusions

The results carried out so far for the atomic, thermal and hydraulic power plants verify that there are no Incongruous Phenomena, which may have compromised the safety of the power plants. However, the results have verified the facts that, at a certain period, safety problems did materialize based on a part of Incongruous Phenomena carried out in the past.

Our company is engaged sincerely to put a stop to the facts that warranted the Incongruous Phenomena, and to the causes that allowed the existence of such phenomena to materialize and to enforce thoroughly the countermeasures to prevent their recurrence and the company is engaged in continuously improving them.

Moreover, the countermeasures for preventing recurrence described in this report were established to deal with each incident, and the company has collected promptly the mechanism (action plan) of the countermeasures to prevent their recurrence for the whole company and they shall be publicly announced.